See article for detailed answer.

AI Is Going to Kill App Subscriptions: The Future of Software Pricing

The subscription software model that has dominated the past two decades is facing an existential threat. As artificial intelligence transforms software from a tool you use into an agent that performs work on your behalf, the traditional seat-based subscription is becoming obsolete. When AI writes your code, drafts your content, and automates your workflows, pricing software by the number of users no longer reflects the value being delivered. The industry is rapidly pivoting toward usage-based, consumption, and outcome-based pricing models that align cost with results rather than access.

What Is the Subscription Software Model?

The Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) subscription model emerged in the late 1990s and early 2000s as a revolutionary alternative to perpetual software licenses. Instead of paying thousands upfront for software ownership, businesses could subscribe to access cloud-hosted applications for a recurring monthly or annual fee, typically priced per user or “seat.”

This model created predictable revenue streams for vendors and lower barriers to entry for customers. Companies like Salesforce, Slack, and Monday.com built billion-dollar businesses on the premise that software value correlates with the number of people using it. As of February 2025, the global SaaS market exceeds $273 billion, with subscription pricing representing the dominant monetization strategy across categories from productivity tools to enterprise resource planning systems.

💡 Key Insight: The seat-based model assumes that more users equal more value—a assumption that breaks down when AI agents can perform the work of multiple humans without requiring additional licenses.

How AI Is Disrupting Traditional Software Pricing

The fundamental disruption stems from a shift in what software actually does. Traditional software is a tool—an instrument that humans wield to accomplish tasks. AI-powered software is increasingly an agent—an autonomous system that performs work independently.

GitHub Copilot exemplifies this transformation. Launched in 2022 and reaching over one million users within its first year, Copilot doesn’t simply help developers write code faster—it generates substantial portions of code autonomously. According to Sequoia Capital’s analysis, even top engineers may find Copilot writing half their code or more.¹ Yet GitHub charges $10-19 per seat per month, a pricing model inherited from traditional developer tools that doesn’t capture the productivity multiplier AI delivers.

The disconnect is stark: when AI writes 50% of your code, is the value delivered equivalent to a $19/month productivity tool, or something closer to hiring an additional junior developer at $60,000 per year? This valuation gap is forcing vendors to reconsider their entire pricing architecture.

The Cost Structure Problem

AI-powered software carries fundamentally different cost structures than traditional SaaS. While conventional software has high fixed development costs and near-zero marginal costs per user, AI applications incur ongoing variable costs for every interaction:

API calls to foundation models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) charged per token
Compute resources for inference scaling with usage volume
Data storage and processing for context windows and training

AWS Bedrock pricing illustrates this reality. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $6.00 per million input tokens and $30.00 per million output tokens on-demand, with batch processing available at 50% discounts.² These costs scale linearly with usage, making unlimited flat-rate subscriptions economically unsustainable for vendors.

What Are the Emerging AI Pricing Models?

The transition from seat-based subscriptions is producing several distinct pricing architectures, each with advantages and trade-offs.

Usage-Based Pricing

Usage-based pricing charges customers for the actual consumption of AI resources—typically measured in tokens, API calls, compute hours, or AI actions performed. This model directly aligns vendor revenue with delivery costs and customer value received.

Copy.ai has embraced this approach with workflow-based pricing. Their enterprise plans include “Workflow Credits” representing computational power consumed: the Growth plan provides 20,000 credits monthly at $1,000/month, while the Scale tier offers 75,000 credits at $3,000/month.³ Each workflow run consumes credits proportional to its complexity—simple text generation costs less than multi-step research and content creation pipelines.

Google Cloud Vertex AI employs similar granular pricing, charging per prediction for AutoML models ($0.20 per 1,000 predictions for forecasting) and per node hour for training ($3.465/hour for image classification).⁴

Consumption-Based Credits

Many AI platforms have adopted credit systems that abstract underlying computational costs into purchasable bundles. This approach provides pricing transparency while offering customers flexibility.

Monday.com exemplifies this hybrid model, maintaining seat-based subscriptions while adding “AI credits” for AI-powered features. Their Standard plan ($12/seat/month) includes basic AI functionality with the ability to purchase additional credits as needed.⁵ This allows the platform to transition customers gradually from pure subscription to consumption-based pricing without abandoning familiar structures entirely.

Outcome-Based Pricing

The most radical departure from traditional SaaS models charges customers based on results delivered rather than usage or access. In this framework, AI vendors become performance partners, taking on risk in exchange for upside participation.

Jasper AI has moved toward outcome-oriented positioning, structuring enterprise pricing around marketing outcomes like content velocity, SEO performance, and campaign ROI rather than simple word counts or user seats. Their platform promises to “automate the entire content lifecycle” with pricing that scales according to business impact.⁶

Freemium with Premium AI Tiers

The freemium model—ubiquitous in SaaS—has evolved to accommodate AI costs. Companies offer basic functionality for free while reserving AI-powered features for paid tiers, effectively subsidizing AI development and inference costs through premium subscriptions.

OpenAI’s ChatGPT follows this pattern: the free tier provides limited access to GPT-5.2 with restricted messages and slower responses, while paid tiers ($20-200/month) offer expanded access, faster performance, and advanced features like deep research and code execution.⁷

Comparison: Traditional vs. AI-Native Pricing Models

Pricing Dimension	Traditional SaaS	AI-Native Alternative
Primary Metric	Per user/seat	Per token, API call, or outcome
Cost Predictability	High (fixed monthly fee)	Variable (scales with usage)
Value Alignment	Access to features	Results delivered
Vendor Risk	Low (fixed revenue)	Shared (depends on utilization)
Customer Risk	Low (known costs)	Higher (usage spikes possible)
Examples	Slack, Asana, Salesforce	Copy.ai, GitHub Copilot, Vertex AI
Marginal Cost	Near zero	Significant (compute + API costs)
Ideal Use Case	Collaboration tools	Content generation, coding, analysis

Why Does the Pricing Shift Matter?

The transition from subscription to usage-based pricing has profound implications for businesses, vendors, and the broader software ecosystem.

For Customers: Cost Optimization Becomes Critical

Usage-based pricing demands new disciplines in cost management. Organizations must monitor AI consumption, implement governance policies, and optimize prompts to control expenses. The days of unlimited access for a fixed fee are ending, replaced by environments where inefficient AI use directly impacts the bottom line.

⚠️ Warning: Organizations adopting AI tools without usage monitoring risk unexpected cost overruns. A single poorly optimized workflow can consume thousands of dollars in API credits.

For Vendors: Revenue Predictability Declines

Subscription businesses prize recurring revenue for its predictability. Usage-based models introduce volatility—revenue fluctuates with customer activity rather than remaining stable. This complicates financial planning, valuation multiples, and investor expectations.

However, vendors gain stronger alignment with customer success. When customers achieve better outcomes and increase usage, both parties benefit. This creates virtuous cycles that can drive net revenue retention above traditional SaaS benchmarks.

For the Industry: Market Consolidation Accelerates

The economics of AI pricing favor scale. Large vendors can negotiate better rates with foundation model providers, optimize inference infrastructure, and spread fixed costs across massive user bases. Smaller competitors face margin pressure that may drive consolidation.

Stripe’s payment processing model offers a template: their standard pricing (2.9% + 30¢ per transaction) creates thin margins that only become profitable at scale.⁸ AI software may follow similar dynamics, with profitability emerging only above substantial usage thresholds.

The Future: Hybrid Models and Dynamic Pricing

The next evolution of AI software pricing will likely combine multiple approaches into sophisticated hybrid models. We can anticipate:

Base subscriptions with usage overages: A fixed fee for baseline access plus charges for consumption beyond thresholds
Tiered capacity models: Different subscription levels including predetermined AI credit allocations
Performance guarantees: Outcome-based pricing with refunds or credits if AI fails to deliver agreed results
Dynamic pricing: Rates that adjust based on demand, model capability, or customer lifetime value

GitHub Copilot’s current evolution hints at this direction. The platform now offers a free tier with limited access, a $10/month Pro tier for individuals, and a $39/month Pro+ tier with expanded agent capabilities and model access.⁹ This represents a transitional architecture—seat-based at the core, but with usage and capability limits that effectively constrain consumption.

Conclusion

The software subscription model isn’t dying overnight—it’s being transformed. Seat-based pricing will persist for collaboration and workflow tools where human participation remains central. But for software that performs work autonomously, usage and outcome-based models are becoming the standard.

This transition reflects a deeper shift in how we conceptualize software value. We’re moving from an era of tool access to an era of work delegation. When you subscribe to AI software, you’re no longer buying the right to use a tool—you’re buying the capacity to automate labor. Pricing must evolve to capture this fundamentally different value proposition.

For business leaders, the imperative is clear: audit your software spend, understand emerging pricing models, and negotiate contracts that align vendor compensation with actual value delivered. The subscription era may be ending, but the age of intelligent, outcome-oriented software pricing is just beginning.

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Will all software move to usage-based pricing?

A: No—collaboration and workflow tools where human participation is central will likely retain subscription models. However, software that generates content, writes code, or performs autonomous work is increasingly adopting usage or outcome-based pricing to align costs with value delivered.

Q: How can businesses control costs with usage-based AI tools?

A: Implement usage monitoring dashboards, set departmental budgets with automatic alerts, optimize prompts for efficiency, establish approval workflows for high-cost AI features, and negotiate volume discounts or committed use contracts with vendors.

Q: What pricing model is most fair for both vendors and customers?

A: Hybrid models combining a base subscription with usage tiers offer the best balance—vendors receive predictable baseline revenue while customers only pay premium rates for exceptional consumption, with both parties sharing risk and upside.

Q: How do foundation model API costs impact AI software pricing?

A: API costs (ranging from $0.62 to $30 per million tokens depending on the model) create a pricing floor that AI software vendors cannot sustainably discount below. These variable costs make unlimited flat-rate subscriptions economically unviable for high-usage AI applications.

Q: When will this pricing transition be complete?

A: The transition is already underway and will likely mature over the next 3-5 years. As of February 2025, most AI-enabled platforms are in hybrid phases, maintaining subscription structures while adding usage components. Full outcome-based pricing will become standard for autonomous AI agents by 2028-2030.

Sequoia Capital, “AI-Powered Developer Tools,” March 2023. Available at: https://www.sequoiacap.com/article/ai-powered-developer-tools/ ↩
Amazon Web Services, “Amazon Bedrock Pricing,” February 2025. Available at: https://aws.amazon.com/bedrock/pricing/ ↩
Copy.ai, “Pricing,” February 2025. Available at: https://www.copy.ai/prices ↩
Google Cloud, “Vertex AI Pricing,” February 2025. Available at: https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/pricing ↩
Monday.com, “Pricing and Plans,” February 2025. Available at: https://monday.com/pricing ↩
Jasper AI, “Plans & Pricing,” February 2025. Available at: https://www.jasper.ai/pricing ↩
OpenAI, “ChatGPT Plans & Pricing,” February 2025. Available at: https://openai.com/pricing ↩
Stripe, “Pricing & Fees,” February 2025. Available at: https://stripe.com/pricing ↩
GitHub, “GitHub Copilot Pricing,” February 2025. Available at: https://github.com/features/copilot ↩